Naujienos, gandai...

Idomus insight. Man, kaip Schumio gerbejui, jo kietumo irodinet nereikia, bet tokie faktai, kaip pvz 10+ sekundziu greiciau uz visus kitus pilotus pravaziuotas ratas per 1997 metu Belgijos GP lenktynes dziustancioje trasoje, kai visi su vienodom padangom (intermediates), yra beveik is fantastikos skyrelio:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_Belgian_Grand_Prix

The race is regarded by many as one of Michael Schumacher's greatest drives. He started from 3rd on the grid after qualifying had been dominated by Jacques Villeneuve in the dry. In the morning warm up which took place in hot dry weather, Schumacher was only 15th, but conditions to everyone's surprise changed by 20 minutes of heavy rain around half an hour before the race was due to start. This resulted in the field starting behind the safety car.

Of the top runners, both Williams drivers and Jean Alesi started on full wets while the rest of the front runners were on intermediates. The race began after three laps behind the safety car. At the end of the 4th lap, Jacques Villeneuve remained in the lead with Alesi in 2nd and Schumacher in 3rd as in the order which they had started. Schumacher made a brave pass inside Alesi at the La Source hairpin at the start of the 5th lap and then followed this up by passing Villeneuve half way around the same 5th lap. At the end of the next few laps Schumacher led by the following:

5th lap - 5.8 seconds over Jacques Villeneuve (full wets)
6th lap - 16.9 seconds over Giancarlo Fisichella (intermediates)
7th lap - 22.8 seconds over Giancarlo Fisichella (intermediates)
8th lap - 28.6 seconds over Giancarlo Fisichella (intermediates)
9th lap - 35.2 seconds over Giancarlo Fisichella (intermediates)
10th lap - 42.5 seconds over Mika Häkkinen (intermediates)
11th lap - 47.2 seconds over Mika Häkkinen (intermediates)
12th lap - 63 seconds over Jan Magnussen (intermediates)
13th lap - 67 seconds over Jean Alesi (slicks)

Ferrari 2016
The project 667, approved in Maranello for some months now, will present ideas to sharp break with what has been done Ferrari in recent seasons. It started, despite the good results obtained with the car in 2015, from a blank sheet to try to close the gap ("only" 3-4 tenths in race trim) that separates the Italian team from Mercedes.
This project, the first carried out by Allison-Resta-Binotto will present many innovations and will remain in the car just a few elements of the SF15-T. After four seasons of use of the pull rod front suspension, Ferrari will to use a push rod suspension system. In addition to returning to the suspension system to "strut" (finally we might add), for aerodynamic purposes, the steering arm is lowered to align with a lower triangle that should keep the tuning fork diagram, solution similar to Mercedes in 2015.
The version of muzzle implemented by engineers at Maranello will be at the limit of technical regulations because of what we know will be very similar to the snout used by Toro Rosso in this 2015 (the concept of nose is that, less detail more detail), when in the end of the muzzle will be located at the limit of 850 mm from the Front Wheel Centre Line (FWCL) and the "tip" of the muzzle. Thanks to this, the nose will prove to be raised and with a passage section of the air between the support pylons and the wing, much wider than the old version.
This solution will ensure a higher air flow in the area of the bottom of the car and then the opportunity to generate more downforce at the front which will eventually be balanced by a slender back, but we'll talk about in a few days!

AF1> cia ne kietas o lenktyniavimo pagrindai. Kitiems to nereikia, nes jie daug tiksliau gali skirtumus pasiziureti telemetrijoje. Panasu kad jam ji buvo per sudetinga suprasti ir suvirskinti, tai pradejo nuo baziniu dalyku - greicio fiksavimo ivairiuose trasos taskuose. Aisku paprastam eiliniam tai atrodo kazkas keisto, bet visi F1 lenktynininkai dar ne tokiu dalyku galetu papasakoti, ka ir kaip jie dare kad tobulintu savo igudzius.

gilles82> nezinau kurioje vietoje schumis kietas, net nuo Rosbergo gavo i kaulus konkreciai... pvz paimkim pirma sezona kai jie vare kartu (kitu net tingejau skaiciuoti), tai kvalifikacijoje (imu kvalifikacija nes avarijos ir gedimai is esmes negroja/nepasitaiko taip daznai kaip per lenktynes), santykis buvo 14:5. Skaityk trigubai. Lenktynese analogiskai bet kazkas prades kalbeti apie 'nelaimes' tai tiek to, neskaiciuosiu ju.

Sena naujiena, kad Ferrari nuejo revociulijos, o ne evoliucijos keliu klausimas tik ar pasiteisins, ar teks nuliusti dar daugiau.

YZF>> paskaityk pilna straipsni. AF1 gal numes nuoroda jei busi tyliai ;) Tada nebuvo tokios tikslios telemetrijos kokia yra dabar, cia juk kalbama apie 91-92 metus. Tik patobulejus telemetrijai, inzinieriai pradejo suprasti ant kiek tikslus budavo MS pastebejimai apie bolido elgesi. Jie is pradziu netikedavo, kad galima tokius dalykus fiksuot vaziuojant ir prisimint po to viska tiksliai. Trumpiau tariant Schumis ir buvo ju pirmoji telemetrija.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/driving-formula-1-michael-schumacher-some-background-willem-toet

gilles82> tau reiktu pasidometi kada prasidejo telemetrija F1, ypac bazine - greicio fiksavimas trasos vietose. Tai kas ten aprasyta - baziniai dalykai, juos bet kuris lenktynininkas dare/daro.

YZF, bet jau paskutiniais 2012 metais, visai normaliai Q pralaimejo tik 8:12. o lenktynes Schumis laimejo 7:3. gerai aisku nepamenu, kiek is nebaigtu lektyniu buvo DNF del paties kaltes, bet apie pora lenktyniu tikrai sugryvabo pats.

Klepsidra >> http://gazzettaworld.gazzetta.it/news/motor-sport/formula-1/vettel-2016-ferrari-evolution/

Nes jeigu jau taip sakai, tai ir Mersams galima ta pati "revoliucija" pritaikyti:

http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/mercedes-considers-radical-concepts-for-2016-f1-challenger/

http://www.formula1.com/content/fom-website/en/latest/features/2015/12/f1-2015-which-team-won-the-development-war-analysis.html

Idomi statistika apie komandu pagreitejima / suletejima sezono metu.

http://beta.autosport.com/top-50-drivers-of-2015/page/1

Top 50 pilotu pagal Autosport'a

kestokas> tai kuriuo italu straipsniu tiketi: evolution ar revolution? jei keicia priekine pakaba, perdarineja visa gala su ala zero size apie evoliucija sunku kalbeti

tai pullrod nebebus jau? :)

Klepsidra >> abiem :) mano nuomone, revoliucija bus 2017 metais, kai keisis masinu aerodinamines savybes is esmes, o prie situ taisykliu, jokiu revoliuciju jau nebus. Beto, revoliuciniais/radikaliais pakeitimais dar vadinciau tokius pakeitimus, kuriu dar nera jokia komanda isbandzius ar kazko panasaus sukurus, kaip kad Mersu S-Duct'as planuojamas. Pull rod'as -> push road, nieko stebetino, kai visos Allisono masinos buvo su push road'u(beto tik vieninteliai Ferrariai ir benaudoja tokia sistema.) Size zero - tai Mclaren'u sukurtas buzzword'as. Tie patys RedBull'iai kiek įmanomą siauresnį(ala size zero arba tight rear) galą naudoją jau seniai(tik apie tai tiek nesneka) ir jo privalumai yra aiskus(prispaudziamoji galia) ir lengvai isnaudojami. Visos komandos siekia kiek imanoma tureti siauresni coke-bottle'a, kad daugiau oro gautu galinis sparnas. Tai ir Ferrari pastangos, tureti tight-packaging'a kiek imanoma didesni(pagrinde optimizuojant variklio dydi ir ausinima), nera kazkokia revoliucija, o normalus tobulejimas. Mano nuomone, Ferrari daug didesnis issukis teisingai adaptuoti trumpa nosi, ka jau Allison'as jau puse metu ruosia(juk pagrindines Red Bull'io problemos ir buvo susijusio su short nose'u sezono pradzioje, ir ilgai jie tas problemas sprende)

Tech> nu tai kaip beziuresi, tris metus is eiles pasikrove kvalifikacijose. Neblogai pasikrove ar ne?

kestokas> kai daromi tokie dideli pakeitimai tiek priekyje, tiek gale - tai, imho, nera evoliucija. Mercedes S-Duct yra revoliucinis sprendimas - jei Mercedes lipdys bolida aplink ji - bus revoliucinis bolidas, jei ji ides i dabartinis - bus labiau evoliucinis.

“Vettel is fantastic. Last Saturday here in Maranello he made a speech in front of our 1200 people, completely in Italian. It was unbelieva***. In only one year, I can say he became more of a Ferrarista than Alonso did in five years,” Marchionne charged.

Stefano Domenicali, the former Ferrari F1 team boss, looks set for yet another new challenge.

La Gazzetta dello Sport reports that the Italian, who after leaving F1 found a new role at Audi, is now being lined up as the next CEO of Lamborghini.

Viskas priklausys nuo performance'o - pora "geru" sezonu ir Ferrarista ismoks vorrei la macchina degli altri

nevisi toki alonsai :D kur tik ant gatavo nori papult

Oficialu: Formuleje-E dalyvaus Williams - Jaguar komanda.

Klepsidara >> On the question of 'Car or Driver?' He believes it's one and the same as the driver dictates the development, the best drivers end up in the best cars for a reason. I asked him if he could think of a driver who hadn't delivered who maybe could have.... He said 'no, the best drivers get into the best positions.'
Ištrauko iš pokalbio su Jock Clear(performance inžinierius, dirbęs su daug garsių pilotų). Taip, kad nėra čia viskas Alonso ir Ferrari atveju taip juoda ir balta, kaip čia bandai pastoviai teigti...

kestokas> kuo Alonso sitoje vietoje skiriasi nuo Vettelio? Vettelis diktavo ka Newey paisyti, o Alonso Tombaziui, delto pirmas diktavo gerai, o antras - ne? Vettelis diktavo Renault, kaip kurti motora, o Alonso - Lucai Marmorini - ir vel pirmas diktavo gerai, o antras - ne? Driveris duoda pageidavimus ir feedback'a - be abejo - bet itaka developinimui yra gausiai mazesne nei seniau - neliko bandymu. vasario menesi driveris atsideda i bolida ir (su kuo sutinka daugelis komandu vadovu, daugmaz suzino, kur rikiuoteje si sezona bus) - istaisyti fundamentalias klaidas yra is esmes neimanoma (daug Honda siemet pataise - gal Alonso feedbackas kaltas?). Ferrari ir dare tas klaidas iki Tombazio, Marmorinio ir draugu ismetimo - Alonso buvo tiek desperate gauti geresne masina, kad jis pats ikalbejo ir tempe i komanda inzinierius - yra viesas faktas, kad tai Alonso ikalbinejo J.Allena. Nzn, kas cia yra juoda, o kas balta, bet Alonso metu metus dare savo darba Ferrari ir deliverino daugiau, nei galejo masina - ka pripazindavo komandu vadovai ir t.t. Vettelio motyvacines kalbeles ir Marchiones komentarai yra labai miela, bet paieskokim keliu metu senumo naujienu ir net video, kur ta pati dare Alonso ir ji gyre Montezemolo - didelis skirtumas?

ar best driver ends up in the best car for a reason? galbut, bet speciau, kad daugiau yra matter of luck. Alonso savo laiku galejo atsiduri Ferrari, bet pasirinko Renault, Vettelis galejo likti su RedBull ir tureti baisu sezona siemet, Hamiltonui galejo nesugesti deze Singapure pirmaujant ir jis galejo likti su McLaren - kur cia tas reason, nezinau.

Klepsidra >> sekasi irgi geriausiem is kitos puses :) o jei rimtai, tai jo nuomone/zinios uz bet kurio cia is musu 100 kartu vertesne, taip, kad gali nesivarginti...palikim taip kaip yra ir tiek.

argumentuotai pavarei. reikejo pabaigti tipiskai anti-alonso. Good

Klepsidra >> vaidenasi tau su tuo anti-alonso :D nes
to pacio inzinierio zodziai:
In this respect he couldn't speak highly enough of Michael Schumacher, Lewis, Vettel and Alonso. Men he marked as being truly phenomenally talented and a*** to direct, inspire and encourage their teams. Also he mentioned how the best champions have this 'edge' to them. Lewis and Alonso's attitude, Schumacher ruthlessness and Vettel's quirkiness.

sena gera tema:
They won four world championships on the bounce and were afforded every political and sporting advantage that they requested.

Tyre regulations were changed, technical regulations were changed because Red Bull were upset that they weren't competitive

Renault motoru bedos:
"We arrived at the first winter test believing that we had made a big step forward between seasons. We genuinely thought that we had done a good job," explained Taffin.

"It was the case in certain areas, but we were caught out in three principal ways. The first was a significant reliability problem with the pistons. We had not seen the particular issue in any of the testing conducted and all the parts were signed off in the usual way.

"The other issue was that we had another part inside the PU electronics that we could not put our finger on and it continued to be a source of problems. The final element is that we braked so late for 2015, taking decisions until the last possi*** moment.

"The specification of PU for the first race was determined very late in the day and quite simply we braked too late, and we weren't ready. We wanted to make up the gap so badly that we pulled the rug out from under our own feet.

Tai kur ta Ferrari sutartis?

Mercedes insists any long-term interest it may have in signing Max Verstappen will not involve it going as far as interfering in the Dutchman's Red Bull contract.

Verstappen is locked down to Toro Rosso for the immediate future, but it is understood that he could become a free agent as early as 2018 if his Red Bull bosses do not give him a competitive enough car.

Mark Hughes recently confirmed, that Renault and Red Bull will run different ICE’s next in 2016. “Both are Renault based,” but Hughes explains, “the Illien development will be the foundation of the Red Bull engine.”

Hughes also makes it clear, the two power units will have “different combustion philosophies AND different ERS systems. Red Bull had already been manufacturing key parts of this system for Renault.”

http://thejudge13.com/2015/12/17/different-renault-and-red-bull-engines-for-2016/

Idomu, kad siais metais Renault jau prieme Ilmor'o pagalba kuriant varikli, nors praeitais metais, ju pasiulymus buvo atmete kaip netinkamus. Visgi gal teisingai AMus'as buvo rases, kad Renault is out of ideas...

Hamilton was also was asked to compare his talents with those of his teammate Nico Rosberg.

“It’s hard to explain,” the Briton began. “Nico is good at setting his car up, and often has a good feel for the direction in which the car should be developed.”

“I am especially strong under braking,” Hamilton added. “I can brake very late, so we do have our differences.”

F1 snapped up by Channel 4 as BBC exits deal early: http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/dec/21/formula-one-channel-4-bbc-deal

Pasirodo, Hamiltonas disleksikas. Dabar nebesistebiu.

Buttonas issiskyre su savo japona-zmona, po metu vedybu. Ka tai galetu reiksti?

YZF, Hondos forma, buvo geras pretekstas palikt zmona :D

Hmm, bet jie daugybe etų buvo kartu..

Breezas>> Butent. Daug laimingu metu ir vedybos su*iso viska. Religion and marriage ***s everything.

The CEO of Aston Martin has confirmed speculation that the British luxury car manufacturer is in fact not entering F1 next year.

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b84713a8-a98b-11e5-955c-1e1d6de94879.html#axzz3vboWoWfT - Williams ir supermarketu saldytuvai